ABSTRACT
@#Introduction: Post-operative pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction remains an important challenge. Steroids are used in various surgical procedures to decrease post-operative nausea, vomiting and pain. However, only a few studies have reported the effect of systemic administration of steroids in controlling postoperative pain after anterior cruciate ligament surgery. Materials and methods: We have conducted a prospective randomised trial with 109 patients divided into two groups to determine if administration of dexamethasone in the perioperative period improves pain in the post-operative period. The patients were divided into two groups: D, treatment (dexamethasone) and P, control placebo (saline). Patients in the D treatment group were given the first dose of 10mg of intravenous dexamethasone intravenously intraoperatively and the second dose on transferring of the patient to the inpatient department. The patients in the placebo P group, were administered normal saline in the perioperative period in a similar manner. Result: Post-operative pain was significantly less in the dexamethasone group at rest and on walking (p<0.001) for the first 24 hours after surgical procedure. Subsequently, the VAS pain scores were almost similar in both groups at 48 and 72 hours. The administration of dexamethasone resulted in less requirement of antiemetic and rescue analgesia medication There was no difference in range of motion and wound complications rate during the follow-up period at six months. No adverse side effect, like osteonecrosis of the hip, was detected. Conclusion: The pain following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction is severe during the first 24 hours and perioperative administration of dexamethasone can decrease the post-operative pain substantially.
ABSTRACT
Abstract: Introduction: Iron deficiency anaemia in orthopaedic surgery is common and there is increased risk of blood transfusion and associated adverse reactions. The management involves administration of iron (oral or intravenous) and erythropoietin stimulating agents. Material and methods: We searched for PubMed, Embase, Google Scholar and Cochrane database to identify the studies from inception to April 2021. Randomized controlled trials with adult patients undergoing orthopedic surgery were included. The metanalysis compared patients who were administered combination of erythropoietin stimulating agents and iron in one group and iron alone. The primary outcome was the rate of blood transfusion and the secondary outcome studied were postoperative hemoglobin concentration, after treatment hemoglobin levels, and complications like mortality, stroke, myocardial infarction, deep vein thrombosis, pulmonary embolism and renal dysfunction. Results: Eleven studies were included. The combination of ESA and iron decreased number of patients who required blood transfusion in comparison to patients treated with iron therapy alone (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59 to 0.91, I(2) = 65%; p = 0.005). In subgroup analysis with oral and intravenous iron, the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.24). Administration of erythropoietin either in high (≥ 80,000 IU) or low dose (≤ 80,000 IU) resulted in lower blood transfusion rates (p = 0.0007) with no significant difference between groups. The risk of mortality, myocardial infarction, stroke, deep vein thrombosis or pulmonary embolism did not significantly increase. Conclusion: Combined administration of ESA and iron versus iron only reduces the number of red blood cell transfusions in the postoperative period in orthopedic procedures with minimal risk of complications.
Resumen: Introducción: La anemia por deficiencia de hierro en la cirugía ortopédica es común y existe un mayor riesgo de transfusión de sangre y reacciones adversas asociadas. El tratamiento implica la administración de hierro (oral o intravenoso) y agentes estimulantes de la eritropoyetina. Material y métodos: Se realizaron búsquedas en PubMed, Embase, Google Académico y la base de datos Cochrane para identificar los estudios desde su inicio hasta Abril de 2021. Se incluyeron ensayos controlados aleatorios con pacientes adultos sometidos a cirugía ortopédica. El metaanálisis comparó pacientes a los que se les administró una combinación de agentes estimulantes de la eritropoyetina y hierro en un grupo y hierro solo. El resultado primario fue la tasa de transfusión de sangre y el resultado secundario estudiado fue la concentración de hemoglobina postoperatoria, los niveles de hemoglobina después del tratamiento y complicaciones como mortalidad, accidente cerebrovascular, infarto de miocardio, trombosis venosa profunda, embolia pulmonar y disfunción renal. Resultados: Se incluyeron 11 estudios. La combinación de AEE y hierro disminuyó el número de pacientes que requirieron transfusión de sangre en comparación con los pacientes tratados con tratamiento con hierro solo (RR, 0.73; IC del 95%, 0.59 a 0.91, I(2) = 65%; p = 0.005). En el análisis de subgrupos con hierro oral e intravenoso, la diferencia no fue estadísticamente significativa (p = 0.24). La administración de eritropoyetina en dosis altas (≥ 80,000 UI) o bajas (≤ 80,000 UI) dio lugar a tasas de transfusión de sangre más bajas (p = 0.0007) sin diferencias significativas entre los grupos. El riesgo de mortalidad, infarto de miocardio, accidente cerebrovascular, trombosis venosa profunda o embolia pulmonar no aumentó significativamente. Conclusión: La administración combinada de AEE y hierro frente al hierro solo reduce el número de transfusiones de glóbulos rojos en el período postoperatorio en procedimientos ortopédicos con un riesgo mínimo de complicaciones.
ABSTRACT
Intramedullary interlocking tibial nailing is usually performed using an image intensifier. But being expensive, it is not available in the most of the hospitals of resource-poor countries of the world. The purpose of this study is to analyze the results of interlocking nailing without the use of an image intensifier. This is the retrospective study of 55 diaphyseal tibial fractures treated with minimally open reduction and internal fixation with interlocked intramedullary nail fixation. The proximal locking of the nail with the screws was made using external jig and for the distal locking direct visualization of the hole was carried out. There were 15 females and 40 males. The average age in years was 32 with a range of 18 to 64 years. The surgical approach was medial parapatellar. The average follow up period was 4 months. This period ranged from 3 months to 14 months. The union time in an average was 4 months. The complication mainly was distal screw loosening leading to valgus deformity and shortening in 1 case. It is, therefore, concluded that interlocking intramedullary nailing can be performed with proximal and distal locking accurately without the use of an image intensifier.